Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christine's avatar

Hey wait just a dang minute, I thought that early tests of the Shroud’s image established that whatever it was, it _wasn’t_ paint, but something more akin to scorch marks. And that the test that dated some of its fibers as being from the Middle Ages did so because the sample used was from a repair that had been done on the Shroud in that period (come on early investigators, can’t we distinguish between the original fabric and fabric woven in centuries later?). Then there are observable details the significance of which the average Middle Ages antiquities forger would unlikely have been aware, such as that the configuration of the scourge marks indicates the use of a specific type of scourge used by Roman authorities in the time and place of Jesus’ ministry…well the more they have continued to find out about this piece of cloth and its image, the less and less credibility the “obvious or ok maybe not obvious but still a fake!” theories have. 😤. Does the stability of anyone’s Christian faith rest on the authenticity, or inauthenticity, of the Shroud? Of course not, but this is one of the most enthralling scientific investigations in history, and yeah I _love_ that the people who are emotionally invested in the Shroud being a fake get repeatedly smacked across the chops with an ice cold mackerel (or whatever kind of fish it was in the home waters of those fishers of men).

Expand full comment
Aaron Blumberg's avatar

I studied theoretical physics in college, and I’m willing to say “maybe” to the miracles in the gospels.

But what I know certainly is that when I decided to follow God, Christ showed me the path beneath my feet and revealed himself on the same path, walking in front of all of us towards the light.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts